The digging you do on here is fleeting, and unimportant in the grand scheme of these happenings. You are hyper-focused on people, on events, on the details of those events.

You could have chosen to dig on the macro history that's been conceqled from you, a great place to start are all of those whacko ops that began around the 30s and continued to run through until today

You complain about those digs being too difficult, because there's not a way to discern the 1/10th of false information that's mixed in with the reporting qnd first person accounts of these events, yet you only need to look at more accounts, more reports from different people at different times, overlay the information that's laid out and lookat the common elements.

You see, the problem a lot of these ops have are that the leadership that directly conducts said operations is inconsistent. It is that inconsistency that has allowed indescrepensies to form, over time, with the official narrative that was pushed at the time

Find the most interesting and outlandish of these operations, and take in that information, even if you think it could be false. If it were entirely false then you'd be able to tell very easily in the future, but the present you has no way of really knowing for sure how valid any of the info is

We have had a look at Paperclip and Mockingbird extensively on this board,so why did the main discussion end there?

Is the philly experiment really just so outlandish that we co sider it to be not worth our time to learn about?

Same thing with the Montauk program?

Where did all of those nazi german scientists go after paperclip was enacted?

Did some go to Montauk?

What were they researching before the war ended?

What were they doing while the war was winding down?

Where did the gold go that it would be missing for 20 years without a trace, only to show up on a ship right outside of montauk?

Did that ship crash?

Does montauk have submarine docking stations?