>>5727889 pb

Pulling rank? huh?

Also, real OP never pulls rank like that.

If it want's to post as "OP" it uses the ID field

Sheriff dude is more credible since he gives examples and reasoning for his conclusion.

All you have "OP" if indeed you are, is a "muh feel" You give no evidence, forensic or otherwise.

Just, "I was there [watching a video] and it happened. I saw it.

That's a fail.

>>5727880 pb

Not that interested.

But yah, those tweets don't look like suicide, they look like angry. Mis-represented.

>>5728125

could be something to attempt to frame him, i.e. a forgery.

Seems like it since we've got the tag team.

>>5728207

There's a booklet on it with citations from different articles.

To insert in live news on TV - they first did the goal lines Football.

The famous case of it used in a FFwas the "commercial jet" hits South Trade Tower, 9/11.

["live" actually 17 second delay] and only ~2 actually shown live- And those did no show impact - but just suggested it. The impact vids were shown after some delay.; The rest were shown later - "amateur" - and given the impression 'live' ]

>>5728433

> and only ~2 actually shown live

Sorry 3, now I remember. One from each of the 3 main networks

They fucked up "Fox 5" the nose came out the other side of the building since helicopter must've drifter, and the masking calculation didn't work right.

>>5728591

No it's not.

It's also not dust puffing out in the shape of a nose-cone, the other side.

The other side was intact.

They fucked up, so one of their later works, "amateur," featured it.

I guess they thought it was better to match it than to have not anything there.

We tend to try to make excuses for things that don't fit what we already believe.

If you studied it, you 'd know it wasn't a steel beam.