Indeed.
>I'll attack the bakers! That'll work!
You are, without a doubt, the kvetchingnest kvetcher of all that have kvetched their kvetching in the history of the kvetchism. Go take rest now, my shill. Your bread consumption is met only by ebot a toots.
44 posts they have, and I'm mentally handicapped? Let's get simple:
Are the protocols in existence?
Are the protocols a demonstrative way to accomplish said goals of conquest?
Is the only thing in question, here, the authenticity of said protocols?
Is the authenticity heavily disputed?
Does this not rise suspicion in, and of itself, about their origin?
Call me crazy, it's your right. I call myself skeptical. If you have read the definition of 'skeptic', you'd probably be less bold as to attack an anon on this board for having such a stance.
Oh, sweetie. This must be your first day.