>>5732962

how about a mix of both.

the 'aftermath' video has a guy on the floor with a baby. the guy clutching the baby is oriental, looks like the guy standing behind the alledged perp in the North Korea photograph.

I think that the video is a comination of staged shots coupled with a rendering using those and panning between them to look like htey were all shot at the same time.

imam guy waggiling finger is a tell to me that it's not a normal situation and the people there are mostly concerned wtih not getting their faces on camera.

Seems, in some of the shots, that the 'face' magically appears on sme guy lumbering across the floor, but it's boxy, like it was pasted on top after that fact, and only shows up for 3 or 4 frames.

It is like the video was taken, doctored, and faces and logos removed from it.

A lot of work to down convert that to a smaller size. Why isn't there one that is higher resolution?

why were there so many different types of pepole in there. No one in there looked like someone you'd expect to be from New Zeeland.

>>5733002

terse meaningless bullshit from you

you don't think, you knee jerk a response.

>>5732931

>448095

this person is a division shill, and pejoritator. Do not believe any of his analysis.

>>5733048

I only reviewed the aftermath video.

I frame-by-frame extracted it all and looked through it individually, as stills.

I didn't watch the other videos.

I don't know how compression algorithms work, but to me the video look like it had been 'composited' with a blender type rendering program. Looked like faces had been blurred and then 'replaced' in few frames.

Only a high res version would show the truth.

In one frame the back of the walking man's head is a straght line.

It did occur to me that this was 'bait' and this is a distraction to get us to waste our time.

and we can say 'fake fake fake' but we have to understand that the technique is to mash up the real with the fake so that the video itself is not a real account of what happened. The video that had was also a mirror.

the guy who is in the first video looks like a rough-trade rent boy, the kind who would appeal to JB (maybe his relative).

>>5733056

never said it wasn't

as I said I think that the aftermath video is curiously low resolutin and that it seemed as though 'compositing' was used.

Here is a close up of one of the frames where the guys head seems 'overlaid'.

note the boxy nature of the head, straght line of pixels on the front and back. Do compression algorithms do this to a round object as it moves through a frame?

>>5733131

>(You)

an alt view doesn't have to be full of meanness and hurtful vindictive division.

my only point this morning is that the low res aftermath video seemed composited.

that is saying: don't waste your time with it because it's probably partly fake.

>>5733203

>>5733214

I didn't review the video that you saw.

I only reviewed the 'aftermath' one.

>>5733325

you are confusing trolls for shills.

shills don't care at all about anything but being paid.

a troll might draw out your fallacies.

A shill just wants your anger.