>>573422

Tasty bread baker!

Have we no Notables from the last 2 breads?

>>573735

QCodeFag was struggling to pay for hosting due to the high traffic his site was receiving after getting an unexpected $800 hosting bill.

He's put in a helluva lot of work writing the initial code and then was kind enough to open it up for others to use. Dissing our hard working anons just isn't cool, we're all one.

>>573879

Did you make yours from QCodeFag's code, after he opened it up to everyone?

>>573879

He was in here earlier and said he'd taken off the ads and felt bad about even trying them. You were here.

>>573945

So you copied QCodeFag's code he wrote and made your own, right? It wasn't always open, he opened it up a few weeks ago when he was having hosting trouble. It was at the very top of the bread for days, member?

And again, he only tried the ads for a few days a few weeks ago. There are no ads on QCodeFag's resource now.

>>573974

So you coppied QCodeFag's github.io code he created, wrote and used to originally set up the resource months ago, and made your own?

>>573991

There are no ads on his site, so how can there be trackers? I saw you both in here earlier and you didn't mention this when he said there were no ads on his site. Why didn't you ask him about it when he was here?

>>574022

Where did you get the code? From QCodeFag, yes or no?

>>574055

So let me get this straight, so we all know. You took QCodeFagAnon's code, which he wrote months ago when he originally made the resource and after he shared it with anons.

You took that code, and added some of your own to make yours 'unique'. Is that correct?

>>574106

Okay, to finish up and be crystal clear,

• QCodeFagAnon's code for pulling Q's posts is made up of open source components but still took a long time for him to write.

t. codefag here too.

• You took his code and made a mirror site from it, adding some of your own code. I think that's great.

• What isn't great at all, to me, is how you are disrespecting him ITT when a) he isn't here, b) you're using his work and c) because he's put in so much work over the past few months and is a fellow hard working anon.

The more resources we have the better. It's the badmouthing a fellow anon which isn't okay and I think you'd do well to play nice.