Anonymous ID: 42c859 March 17, 2019, 8:21 a.m. No.5735100   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5734970

actually you are right. but I think that's how you know that these are humans following a religious practice (i.e. cultural subset / e.g. sauce is legit). Humans get stirs of guilt even if left alone, even for shit some say they ought not feel guilty for. guilt is a human sensation. anyone introduced to this that the group feels needs be sold willingly into joining may inquire or have reservations related to guilt or hamstringing freewill, so authors of the doctrine anticipate this argument and devise a comprehensive explaination to circumvent rational hesitancy. tldr: a real religion meeting philosophical req. must explain how life originate, it's purpose, and what happens after death. it should also be able to pass reason checks at lvl of individual and group. the part of revealing plans in face of victim absolves feelings of guilt, and justifies means to achieve goal of domination.

Anonymous ID: 42c859 March 17, 2019, 8:24 a.m. No.5735152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5734981

not suicide, but Christopher reeves? since going down this hole it has crossed my mind as curiosity whether if he was in the set at some time. South Park Trey and Matt prove to be really knowledgeable at signaling and goings on. They did that episode jointly addressing planned Parenthood selling tissue and Chris Reeves being a consumer of same year and years ago.

Anonymous ID: 42c859 March 17, 2019, 8:33 a.m. No.5735266   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5735245

could this be what Q means by we having more than we know? we could have it all in breads for example, but it takes time to digest, and connect in order to see how they points create the picture. e.g. like the old newspaper comic strips in which a magnifying glass would reveal it's all dots that create the picture

Anonymous ID: 42c859 March 17, 2019, 8:39 a.m. No.5735330   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5735125

hence control. when dealing with a bifurcated form of logic like this, (fyi Sanskrit texts indicate a strong tradition of linguists and logicians, probably reason for 0: thanks algebra) best techniques is account for all accountable variables with data. once that is done you can deal with only exactly two outcomes and rule out EVERY ALL others save for x and not-x. then it makes contingency planning much easier as you only need consider 1 of the outcomes as contingency and the other as certainty.