>>5740802 [Q PB]
>Retweet 'many' for plausible deniability?
>March (17) - message to?
>Q
'Plausible deniability' is helping Posobiec sell books with a RT by POTUS regarding a mutilated child?
Why does POTUS need 'plausible deniability' if he will answer the Q question affirmatively?
>maybe Jeanine can ask…
I have known @JudgeJeanine for nearly 30 years.
She is an amazing person and talent.
This is nothing more than manufactured outrage intended to silence conservative voice.
Frankly it’s very sad.
twitter.com/EricTrump/status/1107394685239287809
We #StandWithJeanine @JudgeJeanine
twitter.com/LaraLeaTrump/status/1107396379847114752
[archive.is/y44dN]
>What is the game there?
Posobiec promotes his book of the POTUS retweet and the paytriot makes money
>Of course POTUS needs plausible deniability. I
Then how is POTUS to answer the question regarding Q?
Logical thinking is that if POTUS needs plausible deniability then POTUS will also need to deny Q