>>5740802 [pb]
>Retweet 'many' for plausible deniability?
Why is deniability necessary at this juncture?
Lets Party.
>>5740802 [pb]
>Retweet 'many' for plausible deniability?
Why is deniability necessary at this juncture?
Lets Party.
for sure for sure… im just ready for him to embrace Q with open arms… instead of needing "plausible deniability"
I think Don Henley fucked kids too :(
yep.. I used to love that song.