Dangerous game Q plays by being so obscure. Too many people with too many interpretations. I have seen a very stupid woman who copies and posts every comment Q makes, everywhere. She copies from Scott Anthony on twitter she says. I don't know who that is. She has been warned to stop, to learn the meaning and to convey the TRUE MEANING of the posts. She is a fool and argues that Q wants us to spread his word everywhere. It is the folly of her ways, and ways like hers that work against us. It causes multiple arguments between stubborn fools who insist on being the official Q interpreter of YouTube and other places. Many of whom have 1000's of followers, but spew the wrong message that Q confirms here. Those people who wish to be on our side, work against us and they are unreachable. How do we fix this?
I'm sorry, I was asking the legitimate anons who work together with me to resolve issues and understand Q. It was not intended for fluoride drinking children, safely nestled away in their mother's basement, following along on iPads. Please disregard so serious anons can assist.
Yes, plausible deniability is certain, but can it not be done with a sufficient amount of plausible deniability and not be so obscure? Or perhaps a better way we can define the narratives as they unfold and pass them along to the youtubers? Although I'm certain they wouldn't go for that, after all, without even coming here, they know far more than the rest of us oldfags. So hence, the dilema we face. With no obvious answer.
Yes, excellent point. The problem is those who get their Q posts from Twatter, or else where and just start spreading. It hurts us, here, affecting our mission. Is it something we can correct, or at least assist in guiding the narrative?
sigh… I do agree fully with you.
Covfefe was an executive order, I think. I do not, unfortunately, remember which one it was. It's in acronym for though.
I don't believe it is pedo stuff either, but rather, undisputable, treasonable offenses, along with others of the ilk. That is what I believe, and with good reason.
Fuck of kid. I've been here since the beginning and years before that. You on the other hand are young, fluoridated and can only parrot insults that were once hurled at you. You lack the intelligence to think for yourself or render forth complete sentences that you composed yourself. All the true anons here who have been giving this their all since the beginning take note of those of you who suggest, "lurk moar" and filter then accordingly, as I am doing to you, in 3…2…1…