So I've been poking around some of the other editions of Covert Action Information Bulletin publications and stumbled upon this.
Not Earth shattering, but somewhat enlightening to me given how long ago this was written.
Note the last paragraph and what it say regarding the NSA and Mil_Int.
Seems like the mistrust between the Clowns and MI goes back a long way.
It's true.
When the OIG finds evidence of wrongdoing he is duty-bound to report it to the AG and DAG immediately.
Sessions was very clear from the beginning that he won't be announcing or telegraphing his moves.
Same as Trump.
OIG Horowitz has been compiling his report for over a year. This fact, when taken with what I wrote above, could lend good credence to the idea that several investigations are underway right now and have been for months.
Makes Q's beginning posts about Mr. Podesta and HA being indicted in Nov totally possible, it's just somehow been kept under wraps.
I'm praying too anon.
The above I was referring to was just the first sentence of that post you responded too, not an additional post.
For sure and 10 Clowns present compared to 1 or 2 from the other depts.
Love that the NSA and Mil_Int never went to them though!
This is a good article by Sars A Carter.
When looked through anon-eyes, ie trust Sessions, you can see more to the root of what is going on.
Yes IG Horowitz can’t bring charges, but his investigators have been collecting evidence, that can be used for criminal referral, for over a year now.
This evidence can be handed over to a Special Counsel once it is prepared and delivered.
I don’t see the case against a SC and the case for it being in real conflict, knowing that the groundwork to prepare and redpill the public preemptively is on going.
I believe Mueller must fail in his task first.
Then Sessions will no longer be recused from anything.
Then a new SC can be appointed.
Arguments Against a Special Counsel per DOJ:
Like a federal prosecutor, a special counsel in the Department of Justice can’t bring a case before a court unless its investigators find evidence of a crime.
Special counsel investigators are usually FBI. If the special counsel agrees that there is a conflict of interest in bringing FBI investigators into the fold it would have to select a different team of investigators to aide in the case.
The special counsel could use the Post Master General or the DEA but those investigators would be far behind the DOJ’s Inspector General investigators, who have already been working on the cases.
Federal prosecutors, special counsels, and those attorneys working with them do not “conduct” investigations. DOJ officials told me that the process is much like the TV show law and order where law enforcement brings evidence of a crime and then the prosecutor puts together a case to be brought before the court.
The DOJ Inspector General is an independent office that investigates possible violations of criminal and civil law by employees of the FBI and its own department.
The Inspector General reports to the Attorney General and to Congress.
The IG’s Investigations Division Special Agents develop cases for criminal prosecution, civil or administrative action.
Inspector General’s office acts similar to the FBI in that it has the authority to investigate wrongdoing and collect evidence.
The Inspector General has the power to subpoena and present cases for criminal prosecution to the Attorney General.
Arguments For a Special Counsel, per Congressional Members:
An independent arbiter because the FBI and DOJ cannot investigate themselves.
Any criminal referral from the Inspector General will go to Attorney General Jeff Sessions for prosecution and he has not made clear the scope of his involvement in the cases.
Republicans and some senior government officials say there is no rational argument for letting current Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who was the former head of the FBI, expand his special counsel investigation. It won’t work because of Mueller, as the former director of the FBI, is conflicted out.
Robert Mueller’s investigation crosses into the territory of the unsubstantiated and salacious dossier, he is after all supposed to be investigating alleged collusion between Russia and President Trump. And he’s reportedly using the unverified dossier crafted by former British spy Christopher Steele in his investigation. A dossier, which Steele, told the British courts is not verified.
Mueller has close previous working relationships with many of the same players he would be investigating. For example, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, former FBI Director James Comey, to name two.
The American public won’t buy into an investigation by Mueller, the DOJ or FBI.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions has never clearly stated where his recusal begins and ends.
A second special counsel needs to come from outside Washington D.C. with its own team of impartial, hand selected investigators.
https:// saraacarter.com/the-case-for-and-against-a-special-counsel-investigation-of-doj-and-fbi/