>>5747270

This tells you that he gets paid in shares. Monetizes it by selling them at weekly intervals.

(and boy that is quite a bit of monetization)

Same thing with that FB guy we were digging into a few months ago.

Incidentally, look how much the share price has gone up since Jan. 2.

>>5747366

It would be suspicious if it started suddenly… or the amount went up suddenly. But this is a regular occurrence. Looks like he gets paid in shares instead of cash (or gets paid a relatively small amount).

Incentive to get the share price up.

>>5747270

Can you provide a more specific sauce?

Dorsey doesn't appear anywhere on here:

https://www.insider-monitor.com/trading/cik1418091.html

And if you search here, his last transaction was supposedly in 2017.

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/twtr/insiders?pid=78665041

>>5747270

>>5747532

Also, current share price is just over $30, not $77.

Gonna have to call this one fake and gay without better sauce.

>>5747666

Well, that is much different.

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/sq/insiders?pid=78665041

Data still suggests he is getting paid with 103k shares every week and then is turning around and selling them to get the cash.

Not really nefarious to me.

>>5747827

If you look here >>5747764 you can see that he gets 103k shares every week (paid in shares)… then he sells them in two or three separate transactions.

>>5747923

He may also only get a negligible actual salary ($1/year?) and gets paid in shares as an incentive to keep the share price up.

But what is the point in just amassing shares? Why would you not cash them out into something you can actually use?

He knows he will just get another 103k shares next week, so why not?

Way beyond my pay grade, but I bet a lot of the upper ranks are like that.