>>5748559
>>5748484
I had thought this paper was first written in 2008 or 2009, since I remembered writing it at my old house. But with
some further digging I found the first draft was actually written in December 2007. You can see signs of that in the
paper itself, where it says that the event happened 44 years ago. Obviously, I had to have written that in 2007 or early
-
Within a year or so I had put the paper up on the internet, but I can't remember if that was 2008 or 2009. I will
say 2009. I couldn't find the paper at the Wayback Machine, which is curious. But regardless, the paper has been up
on the internet for most of the past 6 years (not including 2013, when I took it down as a favor to the woman I was
living with), but as an html, not a pdf. It was not linked into either of my websites' index or updates pages, but
existed unlinked and unadvertised, known only to those I gave the URL to. I now suspect it was found by some other
people, who no doubt reached it using the right search terms. When I first wrote this in 2007, I searched on similar
theories and found nothing, so it is curious to find so many now. Those who have promoted similar theories in the
past 6 or 7 years may have read this paper. I suspect some or all of them of trying to pervert it on purpose, by
surrounding it with noise, which is why I have now linked it into my updates page and gone public. I am sure
DallasGoldBug has done this, and the others on youtube and elsewhere may be doing a similar thing. I have no
connections to any other person or site promoting similar research into faked events, and do not recommend or trust
any of them. I work alone, under my own name, and have a full bio up as proof of my identity. I do my own research,
and do not read anyone else's research going in. I like to look at events fresh, which is probably why I discover things
other people do not.
*http://video.google.com/videoplay?
docid=5364744251931637753&q=kennedy+speech+secret+societies+full&total=76&start=30&num=10&so=0&type
=search&plindex=6
**http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=3902495&page=1
1This is why Bill Cooper (for one) was allowed to go on the mainstream media with his theories. It wasn't because the
CIA didn't want to create a martyr. It was because the CIA was happy to see Cooper re-selling the theory that Kennedy
had been assassinated. It was never the form that was important, it was the message.
2Davis, Deborah. Katharine the Great.
3http://www.jfklibrary.org/NR/rdonlyres/8259F649-9A3C-4CE4-843E-
8E41AFF26EC7/48804/CaseyJosephE_oralhistory.pdf
4I later discovered that H. R. Haldeman had confirmed my reading of this. He wrote, “It seems that with all those
Nixon references to the Bay of Pigs, he was actually referring to the Kennedy assassination.” Haldeman Diaries,
1994.
5 For instance, in the 1978 BBC documentary I linked above, the producers try to implicate both Hoffa and Trafficante.
This is convenient, since the Kennedys had been targeting both for many years, in order to steal their businesses (and
bust up the unions).
6 To tie up another loose end, it is now clear Sam Giancana's death was also faked. Remember, Giancana had been
linked to the Kennedys from way back. He had helped deliver the 1960 election. He was no enemy of the Kennedys.
In fact, he was an ally. Bobby only appeared to go after Giancana. It was another show. But after the fake main
event, some in the Mob got suspicious that Giancana was a double agent, as it were. So Giancana also had to go
underground for his own safety at the same time JFK did. He was simply relocated, probably to South America or the
Caribbean. Since Trafficante was allied to Giancana, he was also left alone by the Kennedys. I mean, they took over
his business, but they never had any need to kill him or relocate him. He saw the lay of the land early on, and worked
with the new bosses. He was happy to help them fake their stories and pin the blame wherever they saw fit.
3/4 (ends up 3/3) last piece of drop