dChan
Anon ID: 57e025 Q March 18, 2019, 1:18 a.m. No.5750040   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Q, please get back up to 100 000 feet. We are bored with court dramas and soap operas. We want the real truth now! We are ready. Tell us everything. The 9 densities, Angels, demons, heaven, aliens and more. We want to know everything now.

Anon ID: 57e025 March 18, 2019, 1:37 a.m. No.5750130   🗄️.is 🔗kun

To Q:

Has Podesta lived 14 lifespans already?

Has he used sick ritual magic to achieve this?

How old is Podesta?

How old is Soros?

How old is Maria?

How old are the others involved?

Tell us!

Anon ID: 57e025 March 18, 2019, 1:49 a.m. No.5750182   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0223

Q, is Podesta good or bad? Time to tell us.

 

On September 25, 2015 , John Podesta tweeted a series of tweets in support of the Global Goals organization. Global Goals promotes 17 Sustainable Global Goals adopted by the UN, with Sept 25 being the day they were formally adopted.

 

Metabunk 2018-08-27 10-37-31.

 

In the tweet above, he's promoting #14 Life Below Water - "Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development."

 

Podesta's email were posted on Wikileaks, and included an exchange with the person who actually posted the tweet, his assistant Milia Fisher. There was a minor exchange about the wording:

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44007

On Friday, September 25, 2015, Milia Fisher <mfisher@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:

 

My favorite of the #GlobalGoals? No. 14— we must protect our oceans and life below water #SDGs

 

On Sep 25, 2015, at 2:30 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.comwrote:

 

If these haven't gone, I'd change the third to

Important but overlooked #GlobalGoals: No. 14-we must protect our oceans and the life they sustain.

 

From:mfisher@hillaryclinton.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-09-25 16:31

 

Great thanks will make that edit and send them out!

Content from external source

The email exchange also included the image for her to post, so that image is also in Wikileaks.

 

Of course such simple explanations does not stop the Pizzagate (and later QAnon) folk from reading something more sinister into it, for example:

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5bi0hi/podestas_14_fish_hands_explained/

[​IMG]

 

Or more:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1517841

 

I've seen this picture http://i.imgur.com/pT5D46U.jpgJPG of John Podesta with 14 and a fish drawn on his hands explained in a bunch of different ways. All seemed quite complicated. Now I've found an explanation that is simple, makes sense and is evidenced.

Spoiler: none of the above

Content from external source

Many conspiracy theorists are aware of the actual explanation, but they fold it into the conspiracy:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1517841

 

The problem with the "obvious" explanation, which frankly pisses me off every time someone mentions it, is that EVEN IF he was talking about a bullet point on a memo, it is BIZARRE and CREEPY to write symbols on your palms, raise them up with a creepy grin on your face, take a picture, and then tweet/email it to the world. I'm a lawyer, I work with memos all the time, and I've never done anything like.

 

Then factor in the band aid on his left middle finger. Then factor in the cannibal painting hanging in his office. Then factor in Thelema, Moloch, and Minerve in the Wikileaks emails. Then factor in Spirit Cooking. Then factor in that these are KNOWN to use code words and doublespeak in the public (like pedo images in store brand logos).

 

After you factor all of that in, the Thelema/Spirit Cooking explanation makes a lot more sense, even if Podesta is using the memo for plausible deniability.

Content from external source

Little claims like this are obviously ridiculous when you know the context. But it thought it was still a good idea to put up a post with a more detailed explanation. Things are often re-cycled and can become part of a mythology where the origins are forgotten. I've seen people present the image as if it came from Wikileaks, not realizing it was a public tweet. So having an explanatory post with all the references might save people some time and effort later.

L