Anonymous ID: f1134e March 18, 2019, 12:25 a.m. No.5749778   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9788 >>9868

Is this still true, any financeanons? This (pic related) from 2015.

Could the tables have been turned in the boardroom?

https://qz.com/519388/this-saudi-prince-now-owns-more-of-twitter-than-jack-dorsey-does/

https:// qz.com/519388/this-saudi-prince-now-owns-more-of-twitter-than-jack-dorsey-does/

Anonymous ID: f1134e March 18, 2019, 12:54 a.m. No.5749905   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5749834

Very slowly I imagine, anon.

Not to say things can't change, you could have big habbenings like arrests etc. but you probably have to drop in replacements as placeholders who protest the changes etc. but slowly change their tune over a relatively short time.

I think you're right though, a very tricky situation. But probably quite entertaining at the same time.

Anonymous ID: f1134e March 18, 2019, 1:13 a.m. No.5750011   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5749868

Yeah, that was May right. The arrests weren't announced until November though.

http://archive.is/Yyn1J

There were some large trades near the end of October, most trades up to then are 10-20mm, October 26 100mm trade, then 63mm the next day. 26th bumped the price way up though, so the next days might have been people cashing in.

https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/twtr/historical

Interestingly the news that day was the market was tanking, waiting for POTUS to announce the new Fed Chair.

https://m.nasdaq.com/article/stock-market-news-for-oct-26-2017-cm866095

Anonymous ID: f1134e March 18, 2019, 1:39 a.m. No.5750138   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5750104

You generally don't want to tell people you have just come in to a large sum of money, kek.

If you were a shit stirrer planning a mass murder you might want to throw crypto currency in the mix to cast some shade on it.

Anonymous ID: f1134e March 18, 2019, 2:05 a.m. No.5750263   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5749973

They're also posting the "hate speech" stuff, then replying as another anon to agree (or it's a team). This is done to taint the tone of the board and provide grounds for censorship in areas where this can be done. You can spot these ones; There will be a "hateful" post and only one reply (for the whole bread) posted shortly after.

(quotes are mine, I happen to believe in free speech, I just skip that stuff, there is no point engaging either since their agenda is just to discredit the board)