FREEDOM OF THOUGHT WILL NOT ONLY SAVE YOU, BUT IT WILL SAVE THE WORLD.

THE DAYS OF FAKE NEWS [CONTROL OF NARRATIVE] [BRAINWASHING] ARE OVER.

ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.

THE GREAT AWAKENING.

Q

Freedom of thought WILL– future tense: OUR THOUGHT IS NOT FREE NOW.

What controls the narrative here?

What controls the public narrative?

What influence do we have on the public narrative?

Why NONE?

Our job: counteract FAKE NEWS narratives– we have not done it, and can not do it.

Why can't we do it?

What does this board DO?

What controls the narrative HERE, on this board?

What is it?

What are “anons”?

What keeps it what it is?

What does it look like?

Look at what this board does.

Is the narrative HERE controlled by FAKE NEWS?

If it is, then what does that tell us?

What is in control here?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?

Do ANY 'public' voices representing “qanon” post here? Do we have any sense of cohesion, anywhere, in any way?

Or is this board just a sort of continual movie, flying by, making sounds and pictures, but unreal beneath the surface, and DOING NOTHING?

>>5751090

Look at these.

What do they convey?

Are we being MOCKED, here?

Really, are you kidding me?

Look.

Comey and Obama smirking?

Big black holes in the head?

Distorted weird faces?

Bad facial expressions?

Cattle herding?

Where do these images come from?

Who/what is mocking us?

It is not Q, who is mocked too…

Why doesn't the COMMUNITY create the images?

It doesn't

Where do they come from?

[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]

control of NARRATIVE (control over you).

>(control over you)

YOU are the news– FAKE NEWS?

Who? Us? The PEOPLE?

Or, "anons"?

Are the "anons" on chans REAL?

Is this a human? [Thread title from 4chan]

>LMAO He shoots her in the back of the head and then drives over the body: What a fucking legend. Muslim invaders over here are going ape shit over this. They are freaking scared and it gives me a raging hard-on. Not gonna lie. God bless him.

Is it real?

Is the power to EMULATE "anons" available?

If it is available, is it being used?

Does this anon (and innumerable other "anons") conform EXACTLY to the MSM narratives?

What is organic on the internet?

How do you know?

If you can control "anons" like this, do you control, in effect, THE WHOLE INTERNET, and hence maintain your grip on all media as a whole?

So is this "anon" real?

And if THIS anon is NOT REAL– then how do you know which other ones are or are not?

If SOME "anons" are emulated, which are, perhaps, they almost all fake?