>>5751081

You may think you are right, but there has been a lot of diligent work by others that prove otherwise. Of course if you have never come across it, you wouldn’t be aware. Many phrases have specific meaning in the original context that is entirely “lost in translation” when you remove any understanding of the usage of the phrase at the time in history and in the culture in which it was used. (Agricultural, astrological, religious, etc) As if the phrase “lost in translation” could not apply to the Bible.

>>5751123

It was corrected immediately after. Derp.

>>5751168

lol good catch, but some look to be made symmetrically and some look like a mentally challenged person tried really hard to make them that way. If the two teamed up to make them, I’d be willing to guess who folded up which ones.

>>5751173

I don’t know what you claimed many times as it is the first post of mine replying to you.

I’m attacking from ignorance by mentioning just because you are unaware of something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist? Of course, you have read every single book by every single researcher on the topic ever.

Won’t cite a single source for you because obviously you know it all. Seek and you shall find. But you know that too.

>>5751283

“Don’t cast pearls before swine.”

>>5751327

I wish you no ill. If you are of the opinion that the entirety of the collegial, scholastic and publishing system hasn’t been from its inception devised and managed by state actors to govern research and what is acceptable in the public domain, we would have a fundamental disagreement.

>>5751661

Deep dives on Joseph Scaliger start to give an understanding.