>>5752673

Thats a good one. I'll use it.

But back to the Q doubt.

Notice i say doubt not,against the plan or against POTUS. People want to see tangible results based on visual proof.

There is no doubt Q and POTUS are connected. There is ample proof of that.

I mean results.

Even besides arrests.

Show me where FB is going under or closing up shop.

Or twatter.

I see the resignations and firings and see a good start.

Yet the left keeps marching on.

No,not the left. The evil cabal. They are panicking, i seenit,yet they roam free.

I am a natural skeptic, and somewhat impatient for games i see as unnecessary.

Trump won,and he is doing angood job,yet is stalled.

Q says indictments and bye Mueller and RR,yet,they are still going.

Tell me what I'm missing.

What am i not seeing?

Results for one thing.

>>5752788

The sealed indictments list is impressive and there should be cause for concern by the cabal for that.

Yet from lawfags,those indictments can remain sealed indefinitely or be retracted at any time.

Much easier to convince people when indictments happen no?

>>5752828

Ok fake Q

i am a Q doubter,you are just an anti Jewish racist faggot.

If all this was an elaborate plan to enslave us all,it would be done already.

Too many fucks just like yourself are so nihilistic that this country was 99% enslaved before Trump took office.

Half the country didn't know shit except when their next government cheese check was.

Fucks like you should just BTFO

>>5752979

I'll check it out. Thanks. Does it mention why none are being unsealed?

Also,there are skeptical people about thise indictments, and their reasons are good.

That many indictments would vastly overwhelm they system.

But there is no denying they are there. Or i haven't heard anyone dispute the numbers.

>>5753002

Kek.

Go figure

>>5753072

Some indictments are multiple for a single individual is my guess. But if we go military Tribunals, I'm going out on a limb and saying it would definitely shock the nation.

I believe it would be necessary, yet many skeptics seriously doubt this would happen.

i am one of the sceptics. No expwrt however

>>5753185

You probably won't either.

I have nothing against jews.

Many here blame them for everything wrong under the sun.

I have no definitive proof of that.

I just want the problem of this evil solved.

I don't care about the origins,I'll let others worry about that.

I suppose we all know the real origin anyway. And it is more biblical than religious.

>>5753256

If twatter is manipulating comments they arw editorializing, and a lawfag could tell you more about how that is antitrust or some other legal jeopardy.

>>5753245

Its easy to recruit Democrat pols.

Just say crazy shit and promise free shit.

Your elected