>>5754043 (lb)

I find the lack of any blood splatter anywhere to be pretty bizarre. I have wondered how a CSI type would feel about it with that expertise. Never any shell casings visible at any time, anywhere. Even with low quality video, it seems you will catch them clearly at least sometimes. I’m not sure what to make of it, just objective viewpoint. I won’t pass any judgment without high quality video that definitely isn’t tampered with, but thus far I admit this makes it highly suspect and understand the hysteria over it. It’s disturbing to even think about what explanations there are for this. Cognitive dissidence….Sadly I doubt we will ever know.

>>5754358

Perhaps. The markings on the top of the gun seem like it would aid augmented reality type effects. Im skeptical of snippets without time stamps and easily verifiable methods because there is a $$ motive for YouTube channels and such to get subscribers. Confirmation bias also can cloud logic. But I admit some of this scream that fuckery is afoot, yet we would never have the raw footage to prove it.

>>5754413

(Raw meaning of sufficient quality to really make the case.) They will say it was low quality or tampered with etc.)

>>5754832

Only after reloading do the shots break the glass