Anonymous ID: 31d734 March 7, 2018, 1:06 a.m. No.576447   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6456 >>6485 >>6510 >>6701 >>6755

Q drop from 3 march, apparent response to the shooting on the White House lawn. They shit on his front step, a response was implemented.

 

>Zebra_Zebra.

 

Call sign to establish contact. Refer to the Zebra_Pacific from 14 Feb drop:

 

ZEBRA_PACIFIC_SIG_COMM_[GOOD]

DESIGNATE CODE: [ _D7_UND<93829]

ACTIVATE CODE: [0 0000 018739 7-ZjG]

Q, DELTA

 

>Bring the thunder.

 

Lightning brings the thunder, massive energy unleashed instantly with great force. Lightning strikes.

 

>KILL_BOX[1A-23x]

Command stringer

 

The thing that's in the kill box is going to be executed, but one meaning of "execute" does not involve killing. 1A is 18USC 4001(a) that Q previously linked to. 23x is Senate Joint Resolution 23(a). Pics relevant.

 

>Light_T_1A-23-go5

Command stringer.

 

Lightning (brings the thunder) on Terrorists, execute 1A-23a, go on 5. Not quite sure about the 5. If it's an individual it's a predesignated individual. If it's a time, it could be hours or days.

 

Notice the text of SJR 23(a). If I'm reading this right, these people will be tied to 9/11.

Anonymous ID: 31d734 March 7, 2018, 1:13 a.m. No.576474   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6480

>>576456

(shrugs)

 

Misinformation? No idea. Still, notice the designation code with 6 blank spaces and look at the Zebra_Zebra post. 1A-23x fits into that perfectly.

 

And no way to know until the news/future reveals

Anonymous ID: 31d734 March 7, 2018, 1:18 a.m. No.576493   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6497 >>6517

>>576480

I agree, but that does nothing for meaning. Is it a reference to mind control via video?

 

Is it misinformation?

 

Looked at it quite a bit, but I can't derive meaning from it without further info. However, that was not the point or focus on what I posted.

Anonymous ID: 31d734 March 7, 2018, 1:24 a.m. No.576510   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>576497

I believe so, yes. See the graphic on the post with all the Qdrops lined up.

 

Remember, he was walking around like a zombie, he banged against the fence several times first as if he couldn't see where he was going.

 

He shot his cell phone before he shot himself in the head.

 

See the graphic.

 

>>576447

Anonymous ID: 31d734 March 7, 2018, 1:38 a.m. No.576557   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>576546

Don't know about this case, but it's a common enough technique to make it all but impossible to google something. Especially when the news media does it.

 

They've got the tech on their side and I suspect that's why Q leaves a lot of blank spaces in his stringers. When they get filled in later (news unlocks the map) then it becomes apparent.

Anonymous ID: 31d734 March 7, 2018, 1:42 a.m. No.576571   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>576553

OK, so she's a grade-A cunt, probably munched HRC's rug, probably up to her eyeballs in child trafficking and who knows what else.

 

Why is she important other than reserving her a room at GITMO?

Anonymous ID: 31d734 March 7, 2018, 2:01 a.m. No.576643   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6650 >>6709

>>576630

 

Some anon pointed this out a few days ago. It's like a voice to text app would do it. "What is a" can "sound" like "What I say". Likewise, in light of the following question, it makes sense.

 

Class action lawsuits are basically mass tort and that brings the high-powered shysters out of the woodwork to take those cases and they go for the huge damage awards.

Anonymous ID: 31d734 March 7, 2018, 2:26 a.m. No.576721   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>576709

Research class action lawsuits.

 

Specifically what class actions are for and what they were created to do. How does the little guy go after the monolithic corporations with boatloads of money? How do they hire the legal talent to get the job done?

 

What is the real purpose of a class action? Punishing the wrongdoer. NOT making sure everyone gets their pound of flesh.

 

Is Q trying to work within the rules?

 

Would a few well placed class action lawsuits take down the MSM?

 

What would happen if the FCC made a landmark ruling on censoring, shadowbanning and other practices of the bad actors?

 

Did you read the Communications act of 1934? The 5th paragraph of section 5?