anons lawfag here
just started reading the nunes complaint FIRST PAGE
he is going RIGHT after twitter with the exception to the comminications act defense which is
"No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." 47 USC 230
ENTIRE opening salvo is TWITTER is an 'INFORMATION CONTENT PROVIDER"
more to come
more from nunes
Twitter is an information content provider.
Twitter creates and develops content, in whole or in part, through a combination of means: (a) by explicit censorshipof viewpoints with which it disagrees, (b) by shadow-banning conservatives, such as Plaintiff, (c) by knowingly hosting and monetizing content that is clearly abusive, hateful and defamatory – providing both a voice and financial incentive to the defamers – thereby facilitating defamation on its platform, (d) by completely ignoring lawful complaints about offensive content and by allowing that content to remain accessible to the public, and (e) by intentionally abandoning and refusing to enforce its so-called Terms of Service and Twitter Rules
more from nunes
Twitter created and developed the content at issue in this case by transforming false accusations of criminal conduct, imputed wrongdoing, dishonesty and lack of integrity into a publicly available commodity used by unscrupulous political operatives and their donor/clients as a weapon. Twitter knew the defamation was (and is) happening.
more from nunes
Twitter’s technology platform and information database enables it to target citizens based on “audience attributes” like “geography, interests, keyword, television conversation, content, event and devices”. Twitter’s targeting capabilities allow it to develop content and act as a political action committee and, as happened in this case, to squelch the voice and assassinate the character of its political opponents.
lawfag still plucking out the best morsels
Twitter uses its platform, including proprietary algorithms, selectively to convey its corporate/institutional viewpoint, its position on issues and candidates for office, such as Plaintiff, to influence the outcome of elections, such as the 2018 election for California’s 22
nd
Congressional District, and as a dumping ground for “oppo research”. Twitter is not a neutral platform such as an Internet bulletin board. To the contrary: as part and parcel of its Twitter’s role as an internet content provider, Twitter and its CEO, Jack Dorsey, actively endorse and promote the many agendas of the Democratic Party
thats the best bits anons
other than lawfag shit
next step is twitter will move to dismiss and that will require quite a bit of discovery first
so maybe 4-6 months some fireworks thos they may be on the N VA 'ROCKET DOCKET" which is famous for moving fast
yes correct!
OMG after all the possible matches when this first was dug this one still looks the best to my untrained eye
yes all parties get discovery