unemployed anon here, looking for a job in the cannabis industry but wondering why Sessions has chosen a negative stance on cannabis consumption.

Lots of evidence demonstrating propaganda spanning multiple generations, even being hidden or removed from literature including the scriptures. Even when referring to Jesus Christ.

biblefags

The Greek title "Christ" when translated to English becomes "The Anointed"

>What was he anointed with?

google [kaneh-bosm]

Anointing oil recipe Exodus (30: 22-23) includes approx 6.5 liters of cannabis oil

Regarding the current generation, there is also evidence of the lack of support on the "against" side of the argument. Data is being skewed to misrepresent the actual biological results of the addictive effects and biological function of the 421 ingredients.

But at the end of the day, are the negative results any greater than the harmful effects of using a cell phone and social media?

Clear indications of Zucks designing Facebook around triggering dopamine, leading to addiction.

Do the positives outweigh the negatives and again, does Sessions know something we don't?

side note: Would love to know Trumps view on prescription medications and cannabis. Seems like he is not opposed but neither for it as well.

>>577439

That was my initial thought

but after further digging, there is clear evidence of further hiding the facts. Facts regarding potential harm.

It could very easily be private entities who have their own vested interests trying to protect their market, but there are just too many of them to be coincidence in my opinion. I have not found any clear links that would connect any or all of them, besides the basic premise that they are all hiding what seems to be the same information.