>>5767981 lb
When you say "no bodies " were found in the recent crash, what does that mean? I know that in high-speed plane crashes, the bodies may be essentially obliterated. Obviously, there will still be biological traces present; this is easy measure.
At least the VPN is available. But sorry it was necessary. Censorship. Possible long-term up side: shining a brighter light on the issue of censorship.
thx for the info. Don't use a VPN myself, so I'm not aware of the lag problem. Censorship sucks. And in this case, arouses suspicions. Makes one wonder: Why such a heavy-handed approach? Why are the Powers-That-Be so triggered? What specifically are they scared of?
>>5768302 Turkish man arrested in connection with in tram shooting arrested; 3 killed, 5 injured (MSM not interested)
notable
>https://globalnews.ca/news/5066912/tram-shooting-netherlands-city/
I understand they will be in hot water when FISA betrayal comes to light. But shutting down 8chan won't stop FISA from happening. I'm interested specifically of the censorship and severe legal restrictions around the video–the draconian efforts to suppress it. I'm thinking they are afraid of what people will see on that video is they look closely enough. And anons look very closely indeed.
So….if the NZ shooting is a rehearsal for something bigger, the video or manifesto might have clues that someone might be able to detect.
Impenetrable black smoke? No problemo……
Rehearsal? FF? Re-enactment? Hoax?
Interesting discussion except I think that left wing conspiracies are the enemy of all people, not just whites. Unity paramount.
Q has said that the NZ event–terrible as it is–does not have the same magnitude as that which is about to be revealed in the coming days and weeks. So all the fuss they're making could just be a distraction. To have an event this big be designed as a distraction–well, it gives one pause. And the desire to pray.
One other related topic: the idea of this event specifically as an attack against 8chan/Q:
I doubt that this event would be solely focused on taking out Q group. That said, there is no question that MSM aggressively seeks out stories that will discredit us. There is a dedicated group of "journalists" who jump at every chance to wreck our reputation: Sommer, Weill, Rothschild, Zadrozny, and at least a dozen others.
The question has always been this: Do they attack us because they think
a. we are so smart (made smarter by having insider info from Q)
b. they think it's a good way to divide Trump supporters (into Q and non-Q factions)?
c. to scare independent voters away from Trump (because he is seen as a hero by a crazy group)?
Interesting discussion, anons and bakers. Am just learning to bake, so have been thinking about what that means. Also thinking about it recently because there was definitely some shilly stuff going on in the bake a couple of days ago (muh joos, most of you pro'bly know, right?)
At that time, I did call this out, but not publicly, instead passed it along to BO and let him decide yea or nay. I have seen BO intervene in a truly crazy situation with an obviously shilly baker, but only once. Maybe others know other times who are olderfags.
Yes, there will be shill bakers here. And there will also be bakers whose views mean they won't select certain Notes and will select others that anons object to. Can be hard to take, especially for diggers who work hard on a digg only to find it ignored. We all know the best thing is usually to come back later and repost. But still frustrating.
My feeling: I cannot fight all battles. Some are not worth it. On an open board, shills will show up in any role, including baker role. Because bakers are in demand, it may be necessary (or at least SEEM necessary) to accept any baker willing to volunteer. new baker the other night seemed pretty shilly to me, but was still thanked for baking. Maybe some anons stayed quiet, tho!
UNITY is so important to our work that I would overlook a lot of things, including at least some shill baking, for its sake. Focus must stay on the work.
ONE SUGGESTION:
One way to cut down on shill baking, I think, is to have more legit bakers. Would help if bakers have more support so they don't get burned out. Baker assist can be helpful and this also trains future bakers. Win-win.
The other I have seen bakers suggest: to be more consistent about requesting that bakers check in with BO, something shill bakers won't like too much.
Well, it's black, but not a live link. Kek.
You always send the hall monitors home, baker, and it does speed the breads up! But we need more people here when it's gravehard. Undermanned even for shitpostings, but we do try.
tried but it's all green text. Haven't mastered all the details of the board or the archive.
How do I access the following:
Best Of Bread >>311157
Archive of Notables >>>/comms/225 (Batch 740~ present)
Ok, now that I've got a live link, maybe there's a chance to find it…..
Ok, how did you get from A to B, if it's not too laborious to explain? I would really like to know for digs. Or is this explained elsewhere? (@jack is interesting, but this is more so!)
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/966345.html#967105
This obviously represents a "post" address.
All i need to know is what the two sets of numbers represent:
966345 (this is more general)
#967165 (this is more specific)
Thanks much, I'll play around with it.
There's one moar line at the end:
In other censorship news, ZeroHedge is now banned in New Zealand and much of Australia following our reporting on the Christchurch terror attacks.
Sorry citizen, some facts are just too dangerous for your own good.
do you know whether another baker might be lurking in the near future?
Thanks for the notice, Baker.
Well, yes. Sure seems like graveyard when I don't get a nap earlier.
Psychology fag here. Very interesting, narcissism makes sense as an explanation. End of civilization dynamics often association with same. And both associated with sexual depravity, breakdown of social roles, etc.
Chronic sleep deprivation? Nobody sleeps much here, or at least not enough. Feel better, take care of yourself.
Yes, I could see the battle lines drawn in grad school: positive vs negative view of human potential. Positive view less popular (Kek!). New positive psychology holds promise but can also be subverted (e.g., using new "grit" measure to instill grit in children–not ok).