Repost from late last bread, as I think it's notable re takedown of big tech and the media (and revisiting libel cases standards with SCOTUS, as Thomas desires to do):

>>5767491 (pb)

I listened carefully to the Nunes interview on Hannity. Here's my big take-away:

NUNES REFERRED TO TWITTER AS CONTENT DEVELOPERS

Not a content platform, not content publishers, not curators. developers

I imagine many of the left wing troll accounts are actually operated by Twitter themselves, as requested by the DNC.

Nunes alludes to this at the end "and who is behind the fake news [propagated on their platform]"

I bet @Jack actually met with the DNC to set this up.

That would be huge news, and leave Twitter legally vulnerable to all sorts of lawsuits, not to mention criminal charges re FEC violations for unreported donations in-kind.