I didn't see it in notables but I have to assume smarter anons have beat me to this, but…
Nunes' tweet said we was going on Hannity to discuss X.
X in bowling = a STRIKE
Direct link to Q post.
Wow… things must be really bad if the snakes are trying to buy themselves mere weeks at this point.
I put all my faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, who does not and will not fail.
I will support earthly attempts to extinguish evil. I already know that eventually all of this will fail.
Read the book of Revelations, and you will see satan sit on a throne as king over the earth.
And then he gets absolutely obliterated.
So no, I put my faith in no earthly thing, and you would do well to think the same way, as it is a sure path to disappointment.
That being said…
Trump is legit.
Q is legit.
The patriots are super legit.
This will work, if only temporarily.
Are we doing old testament genealogy, or Revelations?
One thing I'm not stupid enough to do is be manipulated in to a showdown on an off topic.
If you want to prove a point, you are best to do it based on the foundation of which the original argument was created.
I only have so much space up in the old brain here, so I choose to fill it with information that is valuable.
If you can explain the value in knowing the name of Moses' father in law, I will concede defeat.
I've certainly got nothing against Jethro.
However, I am no Israelite, and that does not impact my day to day, or future life.
God bless Jethro for his wisdom, but it doesn't effect my salvation.
That is a great verse, and full of profound truth. Unfortunately I have limited memory resources like I said, and so memorization of genealogies has not been my priority. Good for you if you somehow find value in those?
I think your understanding of the purpose of my original message is a little flawed.
So can you explain to me what your issue with my original post was, and why it is you felt my knowledge of the Bible regarding Revelation was incorrect?
We will not bow to your unreasonable demands.
I am open to being challenged and being proven wrong. But there has got to be some meat on the accusation, or it remains nothing but a hollow accusation.