compositing and advance simulations to mirror an actual tragedy to produce a composited 'partially fake' but mostly real video stream, after the fact, were discussed at great length yesterday, and I hear also at pol. Something about bluetooth, no I didn't see anything about bluetooth. But about the audio or that he'd needed the phone for the streaming.
but my thought was if the bluetooth from the phone would play to the stereo in the car then it would still play as he moved away from the car. But that was not discussed. And I said: why bring that up. They'd filled up the bread with discussing that.
but here is what I thought: no one knows what systems he was using for his getup, with the music. Nor do we know how compressed the video really is. or the quality of the equpmetn.
some said 'oh the shots disappeared' but others 'oh, no they were up against the wall. That does make sense in that shot because it looked like the shell casings flew right out of the gun.
did anyone do a frame by frame analysis and figure out if those were going at a speed that made sense?
no one did. no actual physical equations were used. It was just 'blah blah blah' the music from the radio in the car.
or 'blah blah blah' body moved, guy got up, to whizz, and came back' other said 'oh no he rolled, anon.'
or 'the red soda was sprayed on the others'
others 'real blood isn't what you see in the movie splatters' kinds of arguments that really aren't useful here.
Maybe on POL or somewhere else?
but here is the deal: none of this story makes sense and the details of it were seemingly covered up with a very quickly released mashup, it seems, that took out faces and logos, and in some cases actually flipped the stream so you were looking at a mirror.
all for what?
and that these images are now 'illegal' tells you a lot.
People thought it was the sync of the music being wrong.
my point: this has been discussed to death.
slide it no more into this bread.