Anonymous ID: 86eca1 March 19, 2019, 3:19 p.m. No.5778278   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5777996 (lb) <<

Who Interviewed Flynn?

Whether the FBI decided Flynn was lying at that moment has become a touch point in President Donald Trump's recent attacks on the Mueller investigation. Trump has latched on to whether Mueller pursued Flynn on a criminal charge at odds with the FBI's initial findings. Former FBI agent Peter Strzok's participation in the Flynn interview โ€“ and the fact that Flynn was not warned he could be prosecuted for lying and had no lawyer in the room with him when he met with the FBI at the White House โ€“ has also cast political shadows on the case.

Anonymous ID: 86eca1 March 19, 2019, 3:21 p.m. No.5778312   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8666 >>8859 >>8916

Why Is The FBI Muzzling The Only Person With Credibility Left in The Flynn Investigation: FBI SSA Joe Pientka III

 

There is a shroud of mystery regarding the actual facts that surround the first interview former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn had with two FBI Special Agents at the White House. Pieces of the puzzle, however, have slowly come together over the past year. In the past week, those pieces of evidence, or lack thereof, have become even more pronounced after Special Counsel Robert Muellerโ€™s office was ordered by Judge Emmet Sullivan to turn over all documentation and FBI interviews โ€“ known in the bureau as 302s โ€“ to the court.

 

The highly redacted documents revealed a startling fact, the 302 from the first interview with Flynn on Jan. 24, 2017 appears to be missing. The only document referencing the interview conducted by both Former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his partner at the time FBI Special Agent Joe Pietka III, is an August 2017 document. The 302 from Aug. 22, 2017, is of an interview the bureau had with anti-Trump agent Strzok based on notes he had put into the FBI system on July 19. Those notes apparently were regarding his impressions of his interview with Flynn in January.

 

Improper doesnโ€™t begin to describe whatโ€™s going on with the documents, said multiple former U.S. and senior FBI officials. The main question, they have, like so many others, is what happened to the original notes regarding the FBIโ€™s interview with Flynn?

 

It isnโ€™t difficult to decipher but there were only two people who would know directly what happened with the Jan. 24 interview: Strzok and Pientka.

 

So why hasnโ€™t Pientka ever been questioned by Congress or by anyone that we know of, for that matter?

 

THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS CREDIBILITY AND COULD SHED LIGHT ON THIS MATTER IS PIENTKA. HEโ€™S THE ONLY PERSON THE FBI, DOJ AND MUELLER INVESTIGATION HAS PURPOSEFULLY MUZZLED

 

https://saraacarter.com/why-is-the-fbi-muzzling-the-only-person-with-credibility-left-in-the-flynn-investigation-fbi-ssa-joe-pientka-iii/

Anonymous ID: 86eca1 March 19, 2019, 3:44 p.m. No.5778770   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Anons are not ignorant to the attacks of the enemy. They are as old as time.

Did [ ] really say that?

Do you really believe [ ] meant that?

No, [ ] told you that so that you would not become enlightened, like me.

[ ] told you that to keep you down, ignorant, unable to fight [ ]

 

An attack as old and stale as written history itself.