Anonymous ID: cf6155 March 19, 2019, 5:30 p.m. No.5780560   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>0657 >>0769

Just spitballing.

Could the recent pics of bad actors Q posted be the seven that had a secret meeting after Trump's election? (pic related) They were in high enough positions, and we know they're all dirty. I'm thinking 'insurance policy' discussion since some were still in positions to do their deeds.

 

Taken from qanon.pub, #153

Why, hours after the election, did seven people travel to an undisclosed location to hold a very private & highly secured/guarded meeting?

Anonymous ID: cf6155 March 19, 2019, 5:40 p.m. No.5780769   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>0822

>>5780560

>>5780657

Yes, #643 post. I think Q was listing all of the people in the SCIF that didn't have the clearance to be there.

 

Q !UW.yye1fxo No.78 πŸ“

Jan 29 2018 23:36:24 (EST)

Narrative shift.

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”

Nation on alert.

Firing RR = block Mueller.

Firing RR = set up to firing Mueller.

Firing RR = Red line.

β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”-

What was the Senate conf vote re: RR?

Why did RR [BEG] Ryan to block the FISA MEMO from Congressional review/further advancement?

REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators + [2] former O-senior officials + [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].

TOP SEC CLEARANCE IS MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION - HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?

WE SEE YOU.

Q