>>5780705 (pb)

This is bullshit on it's face. BO violated the emoluments clause when he accepted the Nobel prize.

The dims aren't going to be doing anything to the electoral college either. That would be unconstitutional and since they have enough lawyers, criminal if not an open coup. Pretty obvious @Jack was instructed who to shadow ban for political reasons. At minimum that's sedition and misprision or accessory to the conspiracies, felonies and treason of his cronies. How many Jacks are in our boxes?

"Mere mobs!" repeated his new friend with a snort of scorn. "So you talk about mobs and the working classes as if they were the question. You've got that eternal idiotic idea that if anarchy came it would come from the poor. Why should it ? The poor have been rebels, but they have never been anarchists ; they have more interest than any one else in there being some decent government. The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly ; the rich have always objected to being governed at all. Aristocrats were always anarchists, as you can see from the barons' wars." GKC