Short rant then I'm done with this topic:

Be careful who you follow etc.

When the "Brand" tries to sell, Pics related, It reduces the value of the message. This is the same shit that MSM does with "Attractive" short skirted news women; distraction. For someone to believe they have "Prophetic Insight into POTUS"….What the Absolute Fuck???

If these fucking paytriots were serious about the message and not selling their "Brand", they should seriously consider not making statements as such Pic Related.

Rant Over

>>5782115

You First…

>>5782210

Been here since 12/17. so no, not new, not a shill. Just sick of people trying to sell their "Brand" piggy backing on this movement. So Have a good evening Dave and Fuck Off

>>5782210

You spelled Paytriot wrong as well good day

>>5782214

And I'm lovin every minute!!!!

God you guys are so low energy….

>>5782680

My problem with the book is they were all named as contributors. They could easily have all remained anonymous, but had to throw their names in there. To me that is "Selling the Brand".

Wait to see how many of them try to get individual deals as this continues.

It goes in the vein of "it's not important WHO Q is, at this point anyway, it's about the message. Too much focus on messenger creates "self importance" and arrogance. It is human nature.