>>5785861

I have a theory that certain planes developed during 90's and early 00's must have deep-rooted software or 'chip' supplier issues like the QRS-11. No proof. When I see F-117's being pulled out of mothballs and F-15s and B-52's being upgraded, it makes me think someone at Trump Co is looking for increased confidence by using older platforms.

Incidentally I read a piece last month or so about Northrop Grumman possibly shopping and upgraded YF-23 platform to Japan. Could just be someone's pipe dream, but apparently they are pitching something.

>>5785943

The new planes are kick-ass without a doubt. But sometimes a '70 Cuda is the weapon of choice compared to a new Challenger, you know?

>>5786005

Probably just a rumor. But they need a 5th gen fighter, and I guess we won't sell them F-22s. The 23 was just as advanced, and would still be a hell of a plane, while leapfrogging the development time.

>>5786038

WOW WOW

>>5786286

>twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1107758748762849281/video/1

900,000

>>5786356

Yes this is some scary shit. Remember a few months also the NVIDIA software thing they showcased which 'creates' faces is real time 3D, which are indistinguishable from real people?

Hell I think we are already a few years past the point where anything online can be trusted. This just brings it into the limelight.

>>5786416

Some people say 'Strike' but I like the trolling theory of a banned pic