Anons, I would like to offer some reflection on the actual nature of the battle we are engaged in.
Who are we fighting? Some Anons will say we are fighting a Satanic cabal seeking to control the world from hiding. Other Anons might not be so convinced of that, but will allow that we are fighting a corrupt political class that sought to employ the machinery of government to thwart the will of the people. But are we ourselves, the Anons, directly fighting any of these enemies?
Some are. But mainly if they are doing so in some other realm of life. No doubt many Anons in politics, or the military, or the police, or other realms, have recognized the fuckery, and come here via their own personal experiences. No doubt some are involved in a concrete battle against the enemy.
But most Anons are not fighting in precisely that way. But we are fighting. And we are DIRECTLY fighting the fake news. And we will win.
It is easy to lose track of the fact that the fake news is the real enemy. If even a fraction of the things Q suggests are true, then surely the "real" enemy must be the evildoers behind the scenes, working evil. But it is the fake news that makes that seem ridiculous. And it is the fake news that we can fight and defeat.
Let's examine precisely how the fake news has utterly failed. We all know that "Q is real". We know that "QAnon" is coming from the White House. There is no doubt of that. But many of those who control the fake news know that too. Does anyone seriously think that Jeff Bezos doesn't know that "Q is real"? He is not an idiot. He can read, and think, and he can pay others to do the same, and has done so. And yet the Washington Post, which he personally owns, repeatedly runs obfuscatory attacks on Q. Jeff Bezos is literally lying to the world, and he knows it.
What COULD an honest press have done?
1) They could have examined the supposed Q proofs. Have they done this? I have never seen even one example, of anything even quasi-like a mainstream outlet, even subjecting a supposed Q proof to a hostile but critical analysis. There are people in the world today who make a name for themselves by trying to "debunk" fake and fantastical claims. Were they invoked to critique Q? NO.
2) They could have examined how the Q universe actually functions as an online phenomenon. They could have examined how qresearch itself works. It is amazing in its own right. And they could have examined how qresearch plays a central role in the much broader Q world, even if most in the Q army never post or even read at qresearch. Has this ever been done? No. Nothing. Apart from a few slight and utterly inadequate attempts to examine the phenomenon objectively, almost EVERY MSM story follows a script that aims to discredit without imparting wisdom.
3) They could have sought to listen to actual followers of Q as they tell their own stories. Why do these Anons, as real humans, actually believe what they believe and do what they do? Does not the MSM continually push a narrative that focuses on allowing individuals to describe themselves, in their own language? If a man says he is a woman, then he IS a woman! But has the MSM EVER allowed any genuine Anon to tell a story about WHY this seems to be utterly real? NO.
4) They could have genuinely investigated whether any of the "substantive" claims promulgated by Q and Anons have any plausibility. They could have written "evenhanded" articles. YES, the Steele dossier was evidence that DJT was a perverted Russian stooge. NO, it was a fake document promulgated by a corrupt "deep state". They could given each side a chance. YES, it seems crazy to think that…. well, all sorts of things seem crazy at first. But when people repeatedly accumulate and disseminate all sorts of disparate evidence in support of claims that seems initially crazy, is it absurd to ask whether crazy claims might be right? Of course not. But the media failed.
We are fighting the fake news media. They are stupid liars, and we will crush them.