What is the story here? What is the missing/ deleted twat post?
https://twitter.com/seanmdav
Co-Founder of @FDRLST, chainsaw bayonet enthusiast, presidential campaign vet, former chief instigator for Sen. Tom Coburn, Wharton grad.
The Federalist
https://twitter.com/FDRLST
http://thefederalist.com
The Federal Judge Overseeing Michael Flynn’s Sentencing Just Dropped A Major Bombshell
http://thefederalist.com/2018/12/13/federal-judge-overseeing-michael-flynns-sentencing-just-dropped-major-bombshell/
The sentencing memorandum reveals for the first time concrete evidence that the FBI created multiple summaries of Michael Flynn’s questioning, which may indicate they’re hiding the truth.
[…]
While Flynn’s sentencing memorandum methodically laid out the case for a low-level sentence of one-year probation, footnote 23 dropped a bomb, revealing that the agents’ 302 summary of his interview was dated August 22, 2017. As others have already noted, the August 22, 2017 date is a “striking detail” because that puts the 302 report “nearly seven months after the Flynn interview.” When added to facts already known, this revelation takes on a much greater significance.
[…]
Mr. Gowdy: “Who would you have gotten that from if you were not present for the interview?”
Mr. Comey: “From someone at the FBI, who either spoke to — I don’t think I spoke to the interviewing agents but got the report from the interviewing agents.”
Mr. Gowdy: “All right. So you would have, what, read the 302 or had a conversation with someone who read the 302?”
Mr. Comey: “I don’t remember for sure. I think I may have done both, that is, read the 302 and then investigators directly. I just don’t remember that.”
President Trump fired Comey on May 9, 2017, so the 302 of the Flynn interview Comey read must have been written before then. Why then was a new 302 drafted on August 22, 2017? And by whom?
[…]
Once the government dockets the evidence, Sullivan should be able to resolve two outstanding questions: First, what, if any, changes were made to the 302s? Second, did Strzok and his fellow FBI agent express a view on whether Flynn was lying?
[…]
Of course, this all assumes that the special counsel’s office still has copies of the initial 302s created, which might not be the case given that when Mueller’s “pitbull,” Andrew Weissmann, led the Enron Task Force, his team, among other things, systematically destroyed draft 302s.
————–
Give 'em enough rope … and enough time.
Regarding the story at The Federalist (which is a v. good read), I listened carefully to Devin Nunes on Hannity the other day. Nunes said that he expects the declassification of the 302s – Ohr's FBI reports – next. That and twenty pages of the last FISA.
Another Boom? Or is the Boom bombshell dropped by the judge in the Federalist story? Related booms? Kek.
March madness.
Who's gonna be the maddest? Kek.
Faster please.
Yup, a striking detail kinda strike.
See Byron York
|
Memo: FBI recommended Michael Flynn not have lawyer present during interview, did not warn of false statement consequences
Washington Examiner, December 11, 2018
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/memo-fbi-recommended-michael-flynn-not-have-lawyer-present-during-interview-did-not-warn-of-false-statement-consequences?platform=hootsuite
The message of the sentencing memo is clear: Flynn, his lawyers suggest, was surprised, rushed, not warned of the context or seriousness of the questioning, and discouraged from having a lawyer present.
That is all the sentencing document contains about the interview itself. In a footnote, Flynn's lawyers noted that the government did not object to the quotations from the FBI 302 report.
In one striking detail, footnotes in the Flynn memo say the 302 report cited was dated Aug. 22, 2017 — nearly seven months after the Flynn interview. It is not clear why the report would be written so long after the interview itself.
The brief excerpts from the 302 used in the Flynn defense memo will likely spur more requests from Congress to see the original FBI documents. Both House and Senate investigating committees have demanded that the Justice Department allow them to see the Flynn 302, but have so far been refused.
In the memo, Flynn's lawyers say that he made a "serious error in judgment" in the interview. Citing Flynn's distinguished 30-plus year record of service in the U.S. Army, they ask the judge to go along with special counsel Robert Mueller's recommendation that Flynn be spared any time in prison.
I think that Strzok thot very highly of his political skills in reading how things would go. So the script was prolly in his imaginations of future events. Projection.
Chaffetz and Gowdy did not stick to the usual path on the emails. They got stuck in good.
Can you recall where in the texts, Anon?
Tik Tok
http://thefederalist.com/2019/03/20/no-tiktok-not-next-vine-something-new/
TikTok, a video-sharing app with more than 500 million users worldwide, lets you create, share, and watch short videos on your beloved smartphone. According to TikTok.com, the platform is the “world’s leading destination for short-form mobile videos.”
[…]
TikTok is owned by a Chinese company named ByteDance that absorbed musical.ly at the end of 2018.
—————————
China-owned,eh?