"Q 2018-03-17_2018-03-18_2018-03-21.png"
"Q 2018-03-23 13-09_13-14.png"
"Q 2018-03-28 00-03_10-22.png"
"Q 2018-03-17_2018-03-18_2018-03-21.png"
"Q 2018-03-23 13-09_13-14.png"
"Q 2018-03-28 00-03_10-22.png"
ohgod, the cringeโฆ
Mike Rothschild
โI have now fully descended into the land of red arrows and text over a JPG. I'm the star baby at the end of "2001."
https://twitter.com/rothschildmd/status/1107774077861687298
Mike, mike, mike, how can you be so lost yet so full of yourself?
>Anons, this was by no means a failure on Q's part. This was a means to measure counter reactions and participants.
Anons know.
Gonna have to stop indulging the shills and the fools at some point
>Thatโฆdoesn't even make any sense.
Post less, expand thinking, short-sighted non-US anon
>What's the point in faking it then?
controlling/designing what is seen?
plenty reasons, if you can think of them
yes, fuck's sake, spammed to death here.
wanker's not even banned but self-deletes for attention
now anons debate his value
and fake accounts pop up
good job preyingmantis
>racialization
wut
No, it means you need to be able to read & think
To separate wheat/chaff.
Sorry if that's too difficult for you.
Re-read crumbs from the start, if necessary.
Not understanding is not refuting
the only
>blind
ones are those who refuse to read/understand.
anons have doubts, but they are able to think
no one can do it for youโฆ
<complains that anons don't give answers when asked
<complains that anons answers
i mean come on
<The Canadian voters went full retard when they voted in Trudeau.
You say that as if they did and the elections weren't complete fiction like Macron's "win"
> I'm a retard who believe a free speech board should have, at the very least, free speech.
and getting free speech replies to your free speech posts is not free speech ?