The hard dates were set [-21] and the results were nil? Would it seem to far a stretch to think otherwise? We know the DS is here and an active presense on this board. They've been a part of it from conception. Now what if those dates set by Q were something Quite different than what was expected at face value, an HISTORIC event. Seems such a Q statement might just have an effect on DS and create Quite a stir in the swamp. Here is the point I'll make….this was a move by Q to measure DS counter prep movements to a timeline. Q team states a number and monitors DS movements.
Anons, this was by no means a failure on Q's part. This was a means to measure counter reactions and participants.