Anonymous ID: e1a830 March 20, 2019, 7:59 a.m. No.5789169   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9182 >>9208

>>5789152

What are you even talking about ? What does that have to do with my post? The point of my post is that last year /pol/tards were talking about Mueller being our guy and that Greg Craig was next to be indictedโ€ฆ. and now, a year later, that there is word in the MSM that Greg Craig may be indicted.

Anonymous ID: e1a830 March 20, 2019, 8:03 a.m. No.5789222   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9268

HAHAHAHAHAHAH

 

โ†โ€” THIS POSTER WAS RIGHT

 

Q WAS TRYING TO USE MUELLER REPORT (WHICH WE ALL THOUGHT WAS GONNA DROP) AS THE "BIG THINGS HAPPENING" CONFIRMATION BIAS

 

THEN WHEN IT DIDNT HAPPEN, Q WENT "MUELLER REPORT DELAY???" BECAUSE HE WAS HOPING ON THE MUELLER REPORT TO BE THE 'BIG NEWS' AND HE GAVE 21 DAYS TO GIVE HIMSELF ENOUGH TIME TO BE RIGHT

 

AND NOW THAT HES WRONG HES GOING 'OH THEY DELAYED IT;

Anonymous ID: e1a830 March 20, 2019, 8:05 a.m. No.5789236   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9259

>>5789208

Do you have down syndrome or something? The point is not whether he may or may not be, the point is that this man who is being discussed for possible indictment, is the same man that /pol/ was saying would link to Manafort-Podesta back last year.

 

Dont you see how your commnet makes you FUCKING retarded if Mueller is our guy? That means rosenstein is in on this whole thing and not a bad actor. GAS YOURSELF YOU LOW IQ FUCK