https:// www.wikihow.com/Write-a-Bill-for-the-United-States-Congress →
Thanks for confirming & stating it plainly Q. Using the hashtag seemed obvious, yet, the obvious at times is overlooked.
A point that I attempted to get across prior: AT&T's CEO was merely a channel by which the idea of an IBOR was introduced to us. I highly doubt that it was an original idea of said CEO, an, even if it was, it's not an AT&T project. It's an idea intended to benefit all Americans. period.
Nice!
likely
did you mean: China - June 13, 2017: Muslim fruit market?
https:// www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-30291808-stock-footage-china-june-muslim-fruit-market.html?src=rel/14024015:7
Consumers Need an Internet Bill of Rights
Key word is CONSUMERS, that means it's about YOU, not AT&T. Think logically, not emotionally.
All of this ridiculous banter about AT&T. What's more important, who PROPOSED the original Bill of Rights, or the fact that we HAVE a Bill of Rights?
If an anon on this board had the idea, and we ran with the #InternetBillOfRights hashtag, who gives a fuck where it came from if the idea was a good one?
http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html
The title of this article is:
Consumers Need an Internet Bill of Rights
Key word is CONSUMERS, that means it's about YOU, not AT&T. Think logically, not emotionally.
Only makes sense.
Even if the most corrupt corporation in the land put the idea of an IBOR out there, and Congress, wrote it, passed it, and POTUS enforced it, WHAT HARM COULD IT DO, simply because it came from someone that wan't liked?
Maybe flashbacks of high AT&T bills have so many panties in a bunch. If/When POTUS tweeted about an IBOR (which the latest Q post may be setting the stage for just that), how many would change their tune as though they were for it all along?