Anonymous ID: 174ee7 March 20, 2019, 10:02 a.m. No.5790684   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0746 >>1065 >>1242

>>5790516

 

Solidarity is not doable across the great breadth of the American population. That can not be a realistic goal.

 

We did not have it during the Revolutionary War. We did not have it during the Civil War (even within the Northern population). We did not have it during the World Wars. We did not have it during the Cold War (in all its phases).

 

Solidarity is not essential to saving the Republic. A different kind of cohesion is needed. And it does require sacrifice.

 

And, no doubt, beyond what we learn here, there have been dear sacrifices made already and moar to come. This is where we stand on the field of battle. There are different fields and different battles. But there is a time for war as there will be a time for peace.

 

Slow walking the inevitable is wise when preparation is all. Once prepared, and usually we can not be so well prepared that preparations are completed, just not possible, but once prepared enough, and if it is to our choosing, then, the engagement begins and can not stop until victory … or defeat.

 

Here we are called to the battle of ideas and memes. Not to violence. Not to violence. Not to violence. This requires discipline. And it also makes demands on fortune, providence, call it as you wish, the Good Lord, Our Savior, God Almighty. We fight because we must. In our way.

 

Speak to one who has fought, underground, in Poland. Solidarity was a concept, an idea, but also action. Yet the Poles were divided even then.

 

Love Anons all.

Godspeed.

Anonymous ID: 174ee7 March 20, 2019, 10:24 a.m. No.5790975   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5790811

 

Is that the only result that you have noticed, fren? No promise kept by Q, as you say?

 

Why then are you here if that is all the research has meant to you?

 

The previous poster said the devotion to QResearch was terrifying. Seems you too are terrified somehow.

Anonymous ID: 174ee7 March 20, 2019, 10:32 a.m. No.5791105   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5790832

 

One can agree and say, let us fight against racism together. One can agree and stand against violence and against Nazism. Okay, that bunch of stuff is taken off the table. What's next, one can ask, gently, and place a bouquet on the table and admire it.

 

Shall they agree with you to fight against sex trafficking? Or pick a subject that ought to win agreement.

 

Let's not fight over Q stuff but stand against the other stuff. It is not our goal, I think, to "convert" but to open eyes and minds. Doesn't matter to me how the truth arrives in their view. Truth is truth. Good enough that it is sought after, pursued, cherished.

 

Coz at root is that not what their emotions have stirred? A desire for truth. Now it becomes the purpose to reign those emotions, like a rider reigns in a horse, and govern with reason as best we can.