>>5790513 (PB)
On that we agree anon. What DB is doing with that clearance cannot be legitimately explained.
I like her
Thanks for baking anon
You know they are implying that POTUS set him up with his madam. I can see their bullshit coming a mile away. He would have to admit to soliciting sex AND in that agreement would be some bullshit reference to POTUS. If Kraft accepted the deal he knows the left could point to his admission that POTUS is his pimp.
I see you fuckers
The First Amendment protects offensive speech.
Twitter decides offensive speech (from ideologies they disagree with) are dangerous.
Twitter censors what they deem dangerous speech.
CAN WE THEN SAY THAT TWITTER IS PROTECTING US FROM THE FIRST AMENDMENT?
What a twisted web they are weaving.
Interesting argument