Thanks for unifying that into a graphic and reposting! I don't have the skills but it is a message we need to see.
That's not the point of Nunes's lawsuit or the coming storm for Twitter. The point is, if they can (and regularly do) censor selected content that violates their "policies," then they are not a platform–they are a content provider.
As a content provider, they can then be held liable for everything that is criminal that is not censored. Think child pr0n, Libel/slander, etc. This is a game changer.