dChan
Anonymous ID: bb5db9 March 20, 2019, 12:35 p.m. No.5793855   🗄️.is 🔗kun

RUBIO ANNOUNCES HE’LL INTRODUCE AMENDMENT TO KEEP SCOTUS SEATS AT 9

https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/19/rubio-amendment-scotus-democrats/?utm_medium=push&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push

 

Pic related

 

SUN to SHINE

~

NINE SHOUTS ~ SCOTUS NINE

Anonymous ID: bb5db9 March 20, 2019, 12:49 p.m. No.5794136   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Didn't Sally Yates make a big deal about the potential, as she saw it, of blackmailing as the reason she pressed concerns onto the WH about General Flynn? And the FBI agent who went to the various information meetings with her – to give the WH info it could "act on" – was none other than Peter S.

 

Well, read the following and see yet another double standard under Obama's DOJ and FBI.

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/432346-forgetting-hanssen-scandals-failures-fbi-saw-agents-affair-as

 

He was pressed to describe the specific activities that would make an agent vulnerable to an enemy’s spy tradecraft.

 

“A whole variety of things,” he answered. “Drug abuse, alcohol abuse, being in difficult financial straits, affairs, if you’re married, extramarital affairs.” Later he added: “A variety of personal behaviors could make somebody more susceptible or vulnerable to foreign recruitment than other behaviors.

 

[…]

 

Naturally, Priestap was pressed about Strzok’s alleged affair with Page. He said one or two of Strzok’s colleagues brought it to his attention and he immediately told McCabe.

 

“I also spoke to both Pete and Lisa about it,” Priestap added. “I felt I owed it to them. Lisa did not report to me but I felt that they ought to be aware of what was being said.”

 

What follows next is unbelievable. But before reading Priestap’s words, it’s essential to note that he considered an extramarital affair a security risk, yet treated his interactions with the two FBI agents as a courtesy notification rather than confronting them to see if it was true.

 

“I didn’t ask them if it is true, but they needed to know that that impression was out there,” Priestap explained. “And I don’t remember my exact words. But what I was trying to communicate is, ‘This better not interfere with things,’ if you know what I mean. Like, to me, the mission is everything. And so we all have our personal lives, what have you. I’m not the morality police.”

 

Lawmakers were dismayed and followed up. “But that behavior would make them vulnerable to an intelligence service?” one asked.

 

“In my opinion, yes,” Priestap answered.

 

So did he raise the vulnerability issue with Strzok and Page?

 

“No,” Priestap answered.

 

—–

 

Read the whole thing. Not surprising, right?