IF 8chan is anonymous how did the media know if the NZ shooter really posted here?
the burned alive comment was a question. Not a statement. Re-read the drop.
3.1 GDP!
This is a gross misrepresentation of the comment.
-
He was asking a question. AS in, if it was successful? Wouldn't that dominate the news for a day or more. "day(s)" Thankfully it was not.
-
You don't know what he was thinking. In the least. Hence the assessment of your gross misinterpretation.
The point was that the attempt would've potentially dominated the news feeds for days. Similar to the standstill caused by Sandy Hook.
Fortunately, this attempt was not successful. Because Q posited the question in neither negates the point or credibility.
Reading comprehension is very important. Questions are usually denoted by the (?) punctuation as was the case in Q's comment. So there.
Maybe. Maybe not. We'll have to wait and see.
But that still doesn't change the fact that your assessment of Q's comment was a gross misrepresentation.
If you misrepresent someone perspective or comment or intent, purposefully, it discredits you. Not the comment.
How 'bout not tagging so many people with your attempt at a persuasive commentary?
How 'bout hold up a sec and take a breath. Then you might not have to apologize so often. Jeez. Basic shit dog.