>>5793130 (PB)

Q specified 21 days. Not simply a vague [-21] or something else cryptic and open to interpretation – he wrote "within 21 days". He was quite specific. Now he is trying to tell us that we made an error in interpretation.

We have unsettled business to attend to.

I defended what he wrote right up until he tried to evade his actual words. I can't defend that. I've never betrayed Q and I won't betray myself, either.

If he wants to write ambiguous, cryptic, shit – fine. But when he gets specific, he has to deliver.