(LB) >>5796051

What the fuck are you talking about 'angry black women'. You didn't "expose" anything in your pointless rant. Get back on Facebook

>>5796773

I wish Q would tell us if Jared is a white hat or not. I just get this 'off' feeling when I look at him. But at the same time I know that Ivanka is a smart girl & can't really see her missing red flags.

She is the only reason I give him the benefit of the doubt.

Just the whole thing with him & his family buying that real estate property 666.

How does that address not bother a NORMAL person? aka NON-Satanic

>>5796826

I considered Prince Andrew too -but dont think he quite fits.

What about Lord Mandelson?

>>5796843

What???? How do you know he hogged the bread? We're anonymous???

>>5796868

Where you getting the shadow pic from?

>>5796890

I'm usually annoyed by dribble like that - but that one was kind of funny. But really - stop shitting on the bread.

>>5796943

>>5796925

Nah - I think it's a fair consideration. I was convinced for a bit too.

***BUT - look at the back of his hair. Doesn't it look like it has some natural wave to it?

Whoever we're looking for does NOT have stick-straight hair.

So who has hair with a little bit of body/wave?

Jeffery Epstein Case -

Anybody look into Robert Josefberg??

The Mail on Sunday can reveal that under the terms of the secret deal Virginia was assigned a lawyer, Robert Josefsberg, whose fees were paid by Epstein.

https://newspunch.com/court-names-vip-pedophiles-jeffrey-epstein/

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article227184299.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363431/Prince-Andrew-quizzed-FBI-reopen-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-case.html

>>5797105

>>5797105

>https://www.disclosurenews.it/en/rumor-bill-clinton-on-final/

Are they reliable? I'm skeptical.

But…PLEASE Q do NOT let them take the easy way out!

>>5797013

Right but HOW THE HELL can we figure out who is located BEHIND a picture being taken.😕\😞 Any suggestions on how we do it??

BUT GUYS - DO YOU THINK IT'S ALEX ACOSTA?

>>5797228

HEY!! I'm glad you mentioned this. I've been meaning to ask for ages.

Can you tell me how to respond to ALL people in a linked post?? I try to click the other post numbers but then it takes me all the way back to the original post instead of adding into the reply box.

AND - how do we include Q in the post link? Like I see a Q post and theres tons linked to it = but I can't figure out how to post to his original post & get it linked with all the others.

PLEASE HELP. AND THANK YOU

>>5797300

Yeah - I can kind of see the resemblance in the 1st pic -but not so much this one.

BUT he DOES have the same type recessed chin & slightly hooked nose>

>>5797325

Sometimes it seems surreal to me when I look at pics of these people. They look so ORDINARY. It's really hard to picture them loving on Satan & doing viciously evil acts on tiny children. I think our brain protects us a little. Kind of like how traumatized kids dissociate to survive through the abuse

>>5797375

WAITGUYS! Maybe the reason Q asked the question the way he did is to make us look into who would have WANTED the pic taken. LIKE FOR BLACKMAIL.

He asked 'who is BEHIND the pic'

maybe meaning who set it up to make sure the pic was taken.

>>5797418

That's what I struggle with too. How can Secret Service stand by and GUARD someone they know is abusing, raping, murdering children….

UNLESS they only use SS detail who ALSO worship Satan & are Luciferians too???

Otherwise I don't care if you were ex-President or not - there is no way I could know about it. I would kill them.

>>5797453

No - his chin is too prominent. The person we're looking for has a slightly recessed chin.