>>5796537 lb lb lb
lawfag again
see what lewin did?
he represents "john doe" because he says:
Amicus seeks to file the proposed brief as “John Doe” due to …..third-party privacy concerns
if i were the judge i would NEVER accept a filing from the person with a secret ID
unless "NAT SEC"? could be argued?
ie current or former govt official trying to sway the judge