Anonymous ID: e36577 March 20, 2019, 3:43 p.m. No.5797543   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7608 >>7839

Q #158 contains the phrase "lead-in", highlighted by all-caps and single quotes 'LEAD-IN' in today's crumb #3125.

 

#158

Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 8GzG+UJ9 No.150166936 📁

Nov 20 2017 02:29:21 (EST)

(cont..)

When was this announced?

When did events in SA transpire?

Who controlled a large portion of Twitter stock?

Why is this relevant?

Define oppression.

Who controls the narrative?

Who really controls the narrative?

Who guards the narrative?

Does the MSM shelter and protect select ‘party’ members?

Does this protection insulate these ‘party’ members?

Who controls the narrative?

What laws were put in place to protect the MSM from lawsuits?

Who specifically passed this law?

What is immunity?

What prevents a news organization from simply ‘making up sources & stories’?

What prevents a news organization from simply ‘making up sources & stories’?

What previous SC ruling provided protection to reporters from having to reveal their ‘confidential’ source(s)?

How many people are unaware of the ‘truth’ due to the stranglehold?

How must people be made aware of an alternate reality?

What are crumbs (think H-wood/DC)

Define ‘lead-in’ (think play)?

What has been occurring recently?

The stage must be set.

Crumbs are easy to swallow.

What if Hugh Hefner was /a Clown In America?

What is a honeypot?

Define blackmail.

How could this be applied?

Fantasy land.

WHO HAS ALL OF THE INFORMATION?

No Such Agency.

The hunter becomes the hunted.

Operations underway.

Operators active.

Disinformation is real.

Disinformation is necessary.

Silent war (some gets out).

The Great Awakening.

Iron Eagle.

Godfather III.

The Hunt for Red October.

Q

 

#3125

 

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0ad5ef No.5791828 📁

Mar 20 2019 13:11:41 (EST)

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1108407275939606529📁

The attempted 'COUP' [TREASON] opens the 'public' door to more serious……

The PILL must be easy to swallow.

The 'LEAD-IN'.

The PUBLIC must be prepared for what is about to come.

"THE CLINTON FOUNDATION" +++++++++++++++++++++++++

Q

 

I presume this is a marker telling us to associate these two crumbs.

Anonymous ID: e36577 March 20, 2019, 3:47 p.m. No.5797608   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7839

>>5797543

Searching the crumbs for the word "swallow" is also informative. I see some

'easy to swallow' and some 'hard to swallow'. Too many to post here.

 

Re: #3125

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0ad5ef No.5791828 📁

Mar 20 2019 13:11:41 (EST)

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1108407275939606529📁

The attempted 'COUP' [TREASON] opens the 'public' door to more serious……

The PILL must be easy to swallow.

The 'LEAD-IN'.

The PUBLIC must be prepared for what is about to come.

"THE CLINTON FOUNDATION" +++++++++++++++++++++++++

Q

Anonymous ID: e36577 March 20, 2019, 3:59 p.m. No.5797795   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5795331 (pb) Desperate & despicable House dims—let's just say all dims & their toadies—going to maniacally go after more things that obviously only a pack of treasonous hyenas would even think of looking at. Unleash hell on them. Release the kraken. It's coming, it's here, it's going to be ultra fine.

Anonymous ID: e36577 March 20, 2019, 4:01 p.m. No.5797839   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5797543

>>5797608

The diagram should make it clearer.

Q is PLAINLY associating today's crumb #3125 with crumb #158.

 

Lead-in appears in both

Easy to swallow appears in both

Just a few lines apart.

Anonymous ID: e36577 March 20, 2019, 4:10 p.m. No.5797982   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8022 >>8056 >>8165

>>5797849

>>5797746

The A-holes are standing in shallow water maybe stomach or chest high.

The photographer has a camera and does not want to get it wet.

It is unlikely that the photographer walks out to where these guys are standing holding the camera up out of the water over his/her head.

More likely, the photographer is either in a small rowboat or on a dock.

The person BEHIND the photographer is in the same small rowbow or on the same dock.

Think.

Anonymous ID: e36577 March 20, 2019, 4:19 p.m. No.5798146   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5797879 If I had to bet, I'd go with a couple of royals. And yes, whoever it is, why should their possible embarrassment matter in this particular case. Sometimes, yes, but not for this one.

 

And how hosed up is the legal system if it allows Epstein's lawyers to pick the name of a 16 year old girl–without even notifying her– as representing all the younger girls that he went after. Let's face it—screwing young girls was his ENTIRE LIFE. That's what he did. It's not like he woke up in the morning and said, "What good for the world can I do today?" No. It was, "Who's the young stuff du jour gonna be?" A truly useless waste of breath.