These are the ones you don't have/don't have titles for, THANK YOU BAKER!
>>5802012 rt >>5801778 ————————— Rachel Chandler and Paris Hilton
>>5801902 rt >>5801617 ————————— Prince Andrew is deeply connected.
>>5801868 rt >>5801615 ————————— Rachel Chandler instagram pics
>>5801837 rt >>5801566 ————————— Rachel Chandler and Matt Rothschild
>>5801813 rt >>5801561 ————————— Rachel Chandler and an Olsen twin
Confirm?
Night [#] Crumbs Were A Signature About F-117 Nighthawk Stealth Bombers
This is just a theory
There have been recent reports about F-117 sightings and flights, as if they're active again, EVEN THOUGH they were decommissioned years ago in 2007 and 2008.
These were the planes being developed in Area 51 during the 70s and 80s, so they have ALWAYS had secrecy associated with them.
There is new reports about 4 of the f-117 Nighthawkss being used once in Syria in 2017.
But there have been reports of "unidentified or unknown aircrafts" CONSTANTLY throughout the campaign against ISIS in Syria and Iraq, I included just a few. There's so many more.
It's highly plausible many more missions have been done using them.
Then I saw in the articles the use of "Night #" to describe the callsign.
I thought of Q's crumbs on Night [#] from April, a few days before the Airstrikes on Syria because of the chemical weapon FALSE FLAGS.
The last Night [#] crumb was Night [5] on 4/12/18, and the strikes happened early in the morning on 4/14/18.
This is theoretical, but Q posted Night [2], Night [3], Night [4], and Night [5], implying 4 Night [#]s
Night [#] → Night # → NightHawk # → F-117 → 4 F-117s
On the 14th ALSO, there was a giant explosion at an Iranian base in Syria from an "unidentified" aircraft or aircrafts that was blamed on Israel.
It seriously crippled Iranian forces in that area, of Northern Syria.
Q asked "What if Iran created a classified ‘satellite’ Nuclear facility in Northern Syria?", and also asked "Why did we strike Syria? Why did we really strike Syria?".
I don't think we hit targets AT the facility, but we hit targets at this base to PREVENT anything from continuing there, and Q uses "prevent" a lot in the crumbs I put in the graphic, even saying "Prevent at all costs."
The theory is that Q was telling us we were striking COVERTLY, while the international spectacle of the OVERT airstrikes were happening using supposedly decommissioned F-117 Nighthawks.
This also means we could be hitting cabal targets covertly ALL THE TIME, and likely are.
Confirm?
Countdown Hold Theory
Mueller gave Barr the report that EXONERATES POTUS on March 8th, 27 days after the original start of the count down (February 9th)
21+4+2=27
It's plausible that Mueller ALREADY GAVE BARR THE REPORT, and the "delay" is figuring out what and how to release it.
This connects to the Hold theory on the countdown.
Holds are pauses in a rocket countdown (NASA article) that are put in to make sure everything is going according to plan, everything is good to go, etc etc.
Q posted [-21] on a day that was NOT [-21], then Q posted [-21] again, and I updated the graphic to show that.
I counted 19 days of holds and the [0] day with the countdowns as 3/30/19 (checking those numbers)
But this is in the RELEASE of the report, not Mueller giving it to Barr, which I think was given on 3/8/19, based on the crumb.
Barr has to figure out how and when to release it, which takes time and explains the delay and holds in the countdown.
Reminder of the T-Minus theory in order of the events happening:
[-90]: top 4 at FBI removed (happened)
[-60]: Bruce Ohs removed from DOJ (about to happen)
[-45]: RR removed from DOJ (about to happen)
[-30]: Mueller releases report that EXONERATES POTUS (about to happen)
[0]: DECLAS (public release, happens after Mueller's report)
[+X]: IG Reports
[+Y]: ]HUBER[
From Crumb #2856
MUELLER DECLAS > OIG > TRUTH > JUSTICE
MUELLER DECLAS > OIG > HUBER > ]HUBER[
MUELLER DECLAS > OIG > HUBER
ANONS DUG A LOT ON RACHEL CHANDLER, EPSTEIN, AND A LOT MORE LAST YEAR
Use the search engine to see those digs:
https://qresear.ch/?q=rachel+chandler
Exactly.