>>5802574 lb lb lb

perhaps you are right anon and if so no reason to trumpet such speculation it would be counterproductive

that said even simple I could come up with better ways to generate chatter and panic than posting on 8chan

100 times worse/

if this is true then why is there not an indictment of RC?

any theories?

i know Q aint depending on our digs to indict

that is not our role

>>5802975

>>5802882

agreed

i doubt Q would drop this shit unless she had been charged and was talking

what would be the purpose?

>>5803058

i agree with you

however i can only conclude that this matter is already well under way in legal process

otherwise we would not get the "intel" such that it is (circumstantial)

if Q did not have the goods i do not believe this level of defamation would be part of the plan

>>5803184

lawfag here

after i wrote this post i realized that actually Q has not posted anything defamatory at all

and i mean that in the legal sense

there has been NO Q post accusation of illegal conduct - NONE

what does that mean?

Q team posts VERY carefully with max planning and careful drafting

and then what does that mean?

no way to tell

could be advance intel

could be another smoke screen