Anonymous ID: 548398 March 21, 2019, 1 a.m. No.5806836   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6843 >>6851 >>6896

>>5806811

I think its just the cut off tips of the same pair of shoes…. but why, I wonder… Obviously to make them smaller to fit a kid…but again… why???

 

Why not just leave the tips out and make them like naruto sandals? they even look glued in… why glue them?

 

if you have glue, why not glue something on the bottom to make up the difference in sole height? …. Just spitballing….

Anonymous ID: 548398 March 21, 2019, 1:06 a.m. No.5806872   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6891

also… not saying y'all are wrong or anything… but it looks more like mud to me…red clay mud… blood dries black…

 

sauces: own red muddy white shoes… EMSfag…

Anonymous ID: 548398 March 21, 2019, 1:23 a.m. No.5806980   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7032

ok… I'm now almost certain it's not blood… I've seen blood, and I've seen mud… Thats mud…

 

I'm still baffled as to why someone would nest smaller shoes inside bigger shoes with the toes cut off. i mean… you could probably do that without cutting to toes off. then the sole would be even.

 

my first thought was to leave bigger footprints… but missing toes would make that pretty distinctive.

not trying to be 1/2" taller… easer ways to do that.

not training for High-heels… don't know why you would but.. meh..

 

only thing i can figure is it would be near impossible to run flat out in them. though you could simply slip the smaller shoe out and be off with a few seconds prep time.