>>580523

It's the loss of Revenue that they fear most, esp. with no more subsidies or funding from the govt or cabal. They need legit revenue now. Trump is taking out their revenue streams - that was Trump's first hit when he became POTUS.

Q is telling us to be vocal on social media and demand our voices be heard by all means - even using misspellings to deter their algarithms. Q hashtagged IBOR, not about signing a petition - just take a look at all the petitions signed on the WH website.

Loss of Revenue - that's how we get them, right Q?

>>580828

Isn't also the information that crooked hrc sold to China and others re our missile technology?

>>580523

Q - It's ALWAYS about the MONEY!!!

>>580840

>>580865

If we always include @realDonaldTrump, @potus, or any other official govt twitter account along with our hashtags TWITTER CAN NOT TOUCH OUR TWEETS!!!

Right??

Corsi keeps saying in all his recent vids that Trump doesn't even realize that he is being shadowbanned. What an idiot you are Corsi! Trump knows all that is going on with Twitter, esp his own accounts. Why would Corsi say that? Is he almost discouraging people not to use @POTUS or @realDonaldTrump because he is not seeing them anyway? Why?

This made me think of the above. POTUS tweets are protected and anyone tweeting to him must be seen by him and others or else!! Right? I'm not sure if legally the replies/retweets are also protected or anyone referencing his accounts, but I know that POTUS' tweets are protected in the least.

>>581319

…I never get anything like that because when I am looking at his tweets I am never signed into twitter.

>>581346

Okay, then we use the @POTUS account ALWAYS!!! …along with other accts., but @POTUS should ALWAYS be used in every TWEET!!!! They CANNOT LEGALLY SILENCE US!!!

The more we do this the more ammo we have against them legally.

In every reply and retweet we should always include @POTUS!!!!

"I hear you"

He needs to hear us so we need to include @POTUS (Protected account legally) in all our tweets!!!

>>581412

I'm not talking about the covfefe act.

It is already in the law that POTUS communications are all protected. What about communications signalling his Presidential account? How can a private company have the right to stop that? No way!!!