Anonymous ID: 895778 March 7, 2018, 1:30 p.m. No.580834   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0867

>>580809

>For someone off the street, assembly might be too intimidating.

FFS stop believing what you've been told! The entire system is geared to dumb you down.

 

Grow a spine and learn what you can. Ignore everything you think is true. IT IS NOT.

Anonymous ID: 895778 March 7, 2018, 1:33 p.m. No.580883   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0910

>>580863

They created it - it was part of the plan. They knew the internet would replace the MSM and they did their best (text boom) to control all of the companies that resulted in the new media. Problem is, internet is Gutenberg times 1000000 and there's no way they could actually control it. They checkmated themselves.

Anonymous ID: 895778 March 7, 2018, 1:36 p.m. No.580906   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0932 >>0980 >>0996

>>580867

You and everyone else is capable of a lot more than you think you are. I'm lucky in that I'm unencumbered by classical education and I'll take on any computer science PhD in a heartbeat and shred them.

 

If you believe the research the industry and academia push is 'state-of-the-art', you're drinking their kool-aid.

 

Not being nasty - just tired of watching everyone sit around and either parrot industry norms or enumerate the reasons they can't do things.

 

Assembly is exactly as difficult as it should be. It is a direct representation of what the processor does. In fact, while you're at it, build your own CPU. It isn't that hard.

Anonymous ID: 895778 March 7, 2018, 1:42 p.m. No.580977   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>580964

You may want to do some research into what classical education is. I suggest starting with who funded it and how it is structured. You can find a lot of information in Prussian history. Have a nice day.

Anonymous ID: 895778 March 7, 2018, 1:47 p.m. No.581033   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1158

>>580996

>If that's all computer language boils down to then I better get to learning assembly language.

I highly recommend it. It will give you the understand of HOW compilers work - they always compile down to machine code (assembly is just a direct abstraction of machine code.) With this, you can easily outperform most programmers because you know what the computer is doing with the higher level languages.

 

Of course, if you just want to do what everyone else is doing, then you're going to produce the same crap everyone else is and you're never going to know anything about how to get ahead of everyone else. Same as mechanics or electronics. Tesla did not know as much as he did because of his education. He experimented, deduced and proved things in practice. This is not how they teach things in school.

Anonymous ID: 895778 March 7, 2018, 1:58 p.m. No.581157   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1211

>>581143

Part of the problem is each level of reverse psychology requires exponentially more cleverness in the plan. We have to remember that the more people are involved, this also makes it harder and hard to execute more commplex plans.

 

So it may be a lot simpler than we think. Snowden could just be a cianigger and that's that. That's my guess.

Anonymous ID: 895778 March 7, 2018, 2:03 p.m. No.581218   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1276

>>581158

>From the little that I understand of it there is a electric "hum" on the earth, at a very very low note, think 4 to 20 khz?????

I think this is a slide, personally, but I'm not going to elaborate on my understanding of the things Tesla discovered. I'll only say I firmly believe they're revolutionary and the information has been intentionally obfuscated, slid, misreported and covered up. What they teach about a few specifics have been brilliantly covered up. (I don't believe the erased inventions were about the resonant frequency of the Earth or transmitting electricity.)

 

If you only know higher level stuff and leave the lower level stuff to the experts (as school teaches you), then you'll never make anything but incremental optimizations to existing systems. What's been covered up is the real revolutionary stuff.